How SME lending decisions are changing ahead of 2026

Many Irish SMEs assume that funding outcomes in 2026 will be driven mainly by interest rates or headline lender appetite. While those factors still matter, the more important change is happening in how lenders assess risk. Credit decisions are increasingly shaped by behaviours and signals that sit behind the numbers, rather than the numbers alone.

Understanding these shifts early can materially improve the quality and outcome of funding discussions.

Cash discipline is outweighing headline profitability

Lenders are placing greater emphasis on cash behaviour rather than reported profit. Businesses with healthy margins but weak control over debtor days, stock levels or payment timing are facing deeper scrutiny. Monthly cash movement is now often analysed more closely than year-end results.

This reflects a growing focus on resilience. Lenders want comfort that a business can absorb pressure without immediately relying on additional borrowing.

Stress testing is becoming standard, even for smaller facilities

Sensitivity analysis is no longer reserved for large or complex lending. Many lenders now expect SMEs to demonstrate how the business would perform under downside scenarios such as delayed receipts, margin compression or rising costs.

This does not require complex modelling, but it does require clarity. Businesses that cannot explain how they would respond to a softer trading period are increasingly viewed as higher risk.

Decision making is under closer examination

Lenders are paying more attention to how owners explain past decisions. Not just what happened, but why it happened. This includes refinancing choices, delayed investment, expansion timing and responses to trading pressure.

Clear and credible explanations build confidence. Vague or defensive narratives can undermine otherwise solid financials. The quality of the story behind the numbers now carries real weight.

Funding purpose and structure must align

Another area of growing focus is whether the structure of funding matches its intended use. Short-term facilities funding long-term assets are being challenged more frequently, even where repayments appear affordable.

Lenders want clarity that term, repayment profile and risk exposure align with how funds are actually being deployed. Mismatches are increasingly treated as warning signals rather than technical issues.

Sustainability is being assessed quietly

Even where no green or sustainability funding is requested, lenders are increasingly factoring in energy exposure, efficiency and regulatory risk. This may not be explicitly labelled, but it can influence appetite and pricing.

Businesses that demonstrate awareness of these factors are often viewed as better managed and lower risk.

What this means for SMEs planning funding

As 2026 approaches, successful funding is less about finding a willing lender and more about presenting a well prepared, well explained case that reflects how lenders now think. SMEs that take time to understand their cash dynamics, explain decisions clearly and align funding structure to purpose will stand out.

If you are planning funding, refinancing or expansion in the next 12 to 18 months, an early review of how your business would be assessed can avoid surprises later. A short funding readiness conversation now can make the difference between a smooth process and a difficult one when timing matters. Email inof@nsbs.ie or call (086) 8255479

Previous
Previous

The Real Cost of Waiting Too Long to Look at Funding

Next
Next

Why ‘we’ve always banked with them’ is becoming a risky funding strategy